Cognitive Bifurcation and the Ethics of Memory Partitioning
Abstract
This paper explores the theoretical and ethical implications of artificially induced cognitive bifurcation—cases where memory and identity are selectively partitioned. Drawing from contemporary discussions on split-brain patients and personal identity theory, I argue that such partitioning, while functionally useful, undermines coherent moral agency. The work raises concerns about the autonomy of selves that emerge under institutional control and suggests criteria for evaluating responsibility across partitioned states.